Sunday, April 13, 2014

The State of Baltimore in 2014: What We "Celebrate" When We Cheer the Civil Rights Act of 1964

It's as if a great flood came and washed away all that was good, leaving behind fragments of a civilization that no longer resembling what existed in the antediluvian time period. 

No life raft was available, with people forced to flee for higher ground.
The legacy of declaring Restrictive Covenants (1948) unconstitutional and implementing a radical civil rights movement, enshrining it into law in 1964...


Blockbusting in Baltimore: The Edmondson Village Story is W. Edward Orser's story of a racial change in an almost entirely white enclave of Baltimore, with its transformation into just another black slum.

This story is not just of Baltimore, but could be Newark, Camden, Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Birmingham, Memphis, Charlotte, Dallas, Houston, Milwaukee, or Chicago. It's a story of Anywhere, USA.

Once again, W. Edward Orser's book offers the powerful lesson "race is all that matters: adherence to this principle should be the basis for crafting all laws guiding public life."

We start with this passage from the book:
The Trauma of Racial Change
The recent reflections of two women illustrate the poignancy and complexity of their experience in the west Baltimore neighborhood of Edmondson Village when racial change began to occur on a massive scale in the late 1950s, early 1960s. In an interview I conducted with a white former resident, Marilyn Simkins sought an explanation for the response of whites who panicked and fled the neighborhood: "They saw a very secure world changing very drastically," she said, " and they couldn't accept it. This was distasteful, and in some respects it was forced down their throats, and they felt they had no other choice, I guess."
In a separate interview session, Margaret Johnson, a pioneer from the era of initial African American settlement in the same neighborhood, described her own feeling about the flight of her white neighbors: "They were friendly, but they were prejudiced. They didn't want to live where colored people did... They don't have to say it... They'd didn't tell you [why they moved]; they just moved." (p. 1)
 We'd hear from Simkins again in the final pages of the book:
White Attitudes and the Trauma of Change

Edmondson Village's white expatriates dispersed along the natural corridors of suburban migration westward, some to nearby neighborhoods, others throughout Baltimore County's general Catonsville area and beyond to Howard County. Many friendships and family networks persist, and people often encounter old neighbors on visits to regional shopping centers, churches, or social organizations. The experience of uprooting lingers as an unhealed wound, the source of mixed feelings of nostalgia, bewilderment, bitterness, and social learning. Some believe they have found new suburban havens that provide the social homogeneity and insulation Edmondson Village afforded for a while. But others view life in their new neighborhoods differently as a consequence of the Edmondson Village experience. 

Interviews with white former residents of varying ages inevitably evoke considerable nostalgia for the old neighborhood and the lifestyle that accompanied it. Qualities of closeness, neighborliness, commonality, and security bubble forth unprompted in such discussions. 

For example, Marilyn Simkins, who was a teenager in the 1950s, offered this summation of her experience: "Personally, I would be satisfied if I still lived there, if things had stayed the way they were. It wasn't exactly what you would call paradise, but it was a nice neighborhood."

Some white former residents return periodically to see their former houses and the neighborhoods, but frequently they speak of feeling depressed by the changes they see, especially by signs of deterioration. Simkins, for examples, said wistfully: "It's just not taken care of anymore. I've driven through the area since I've moved, and it depressed me so, I don't go back anymore. (p. 163-165)
Why is it those white people were so fearful of living near black people? Why did they abandon Baltimore (or insert major American city in Baltimore's place) for new real estate, uprooting their lives in the process?

In 1940, Baltimore had 692,705 whites and 165,843 blacks; by 1950, the city had 723,655 whites vs. 255,099 blacks; only a decade later, the white population had dropped to 610,416 to 328,608 blacks; by 1970, the city was nearly 50-50, with 479,837 whites to 425,922 blacks.

What scared whites away?

Kelvin Sewell, a black former Baltimore police officer, wrote a book with Stephen Janis that answers why white people were scared away. It's called Why Do We Kill? The Pathology of Murder in Baltimore.

It should be titled Why Do Black People Kill? The Pathology of Black Depravity in Baltimore.
Why do we kill? 

This is a question that goes to the root of why police exist at all, here as well as elsewhere, which is why I'm asking it. it asks why, in cities like Baltimore that spend a large portion of their budget putting officers with guns into the neighborhoods and communities, do people continue to shoot and kill each other with reckless abandon? 

Why, after spending millions of dollars on plainclothes units to disrupt drug dealers, using military-style tactics, does the shooting continue unabated? 

These are questions that I want to answer because I think in the end it matters. We have to ask "Why?" We have to think. Because without asking "Why?" we may continue on the same path that has done little improve the city where I was born, raised, and worked my entire life. 

Because for all the money and time that's been poured into policing Baltimore, the city is truly no better off. Hundreds of people year in and year out pick up guns and try and kill each other. Largely because of this, 30,000 citizens moved out of Baltimore over the last decade, a period when the population of the State of Maryland grew by nine percent. 

We've torn down housing projects and built new homes. Created empowerment zones and spent hundreds of millions to try and breath new life into neighborhoods where much of the killing is done. We've paid more than three billion dollars over the past decade on direct costs alone fore aggressive policing, arresting hundreds of thousands of poor, mostly black men and boys. Homicide detectives in Baltimore City have arrested hundreds of killers, even though, admittedly, our clearance rate could be a whole lot better. 

Yet if I stood today on the corner of Preston and Greenmount, or Lombard and Carey, the Alameda and Belair, where we have concentrated those resource, I can tell you without question those neighborhoods and the people who still live there are no better off. They are not happier or safer. Instead, there is a sense of despair that has infected many parts of the city, a sense of hopelessness that I know has much to do with the reason people pick up a gun and aim it, with little provocation, at another human being. (p. 9-10)
The conditions black people have created in 63 percent black Baltimore are the same reason why whites fled the city to being with, knowing the racial transformation of their neighborhoods would bring behavioral changes and the lowering of community standards.

Whites didn't vote for these changes, but they voted with their feet for safer grounds once the formerly all-white neighborhoods tipped black. Sewell continues:
If you walk down the 3500 block of West Garrison Avenue on any given day, you'll see distinct types of people: menacing young men in white T-shirts drifting up and down the streets, and old ladies sitting on the porches of worn-down row homes. 

Both, in a sense represent the contradictory forces that enable the most desolate parts of the city to survive while remaining for the most part dysfunctional. 

The old women are a vestige of the city's past, the sinew, strength and bedrock of what remains of the generations of African-Americans families that came to Baltimore to work in the Sparrows Point steel mill and Dundlack-area auto factories. 

Spend some time in District Court on any given day and you will see old black women sitting on the benches, watching grandsons and great-grandsons being ferried in and out of courtrooms in shackles. 

And on Garrison Avenue in Northwest Baltimore you will see them sitting on their porches, sitting and the young men, in many cases their grandsons and great-grandsons, hustling, selling drugs, doing whatever it takes to survive. (p. 49)
Some legacy these black grandmothers left in Baltimore, with the arrival of blacks to the city nothing more than a harbinger of destruction as evidenced by the sorrowful state of the city. The condition of Baltimore today is a direct result of those black grandmothers' generation driving away white people, thereby ensuring the city would endure an Apocalypse God himself wouldn't condone.

And yet, Sewell leaves us with an interesting hypothetical,  a seemingly unanswered question in his book that white flight from the city (well, mainly black people) powerfully is the answer:
Why do people behave so differently 20 miles north of Baltimore City? Why don't people in Hunt Valley or Monkton shove babies into bags? Are people really that different in essence? Or are we essentially the same, just shaped by our environment or by the neighborhood we live in? 

This is not a complicated question, but is has some important implications. 

People kill regularly in Baltimore. Twenty miles north they don't - at least not regularly. What should I conclude from that? What type of boundaries of the land have we created that also take hold of the mind? 

But Baltimore is apex of that violent strain. And thus the city begs the question: Are these people naturally amoral or prone to violence? Or, and this is a thought that bothers me more, is the violence I see here simply a payback for the years of neglect and cruelty we inflict upon the less fortunate?

Better put, are we civilized or can we ill afford to be civil? (p. 77)
By the standards of civilization set by white people, black people in Baltimore are not civil; they are the population in Baltimore from which is birthed the violence that drives away white people and the necessary capital to keep alive the flame of a 1st World Civilization.

Were those dangerous black neighborhoods, where menacing black people walk (with black septuagenarians rocking on porch swings), to be filled with white people - you know, the type of people who once lived there but feared raising families around black people who birthed menacing black males - the violence in the city of Baltimore would end overnight.

Overnight.

Wherever white people fled to, they created prosperous communities; whatever black people inherited by white flight, immediately they regressed to the black mean.

Businesses fled, where they once flourished; qualities of schools gave reason for concepts like No Child Left Behind to be implemented, where once students produced high test scores; property value collapsed, where once it seemed destined to only appreciate.

Such is the nature of racial change from white to black.

It isn't just Baltimore.

It's not just Newark, Camden, Gary, Milwaukee, Chicago, Birmingham, Memphis, or Charlotte.

it's not Atlanta, Rochester, Jackson (MS), St. Louis, or Kansas City.

It's America.

The lesson of Baltimore is one that will empower a new generation of leaders to reassess the trajectory of this country, for the continued path will only ensure more neighborhoods populated by aging black women with menacing black men loitering in white t-shirts.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 ensured the Baltimore of Marilyn Simkins would turn into the Baltimore of Kelvin Sewell.

This is not worth celebrating.


75 comments:

Ex-Brooklynite said...

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 ensured the Baltimore of Marilyn Simkins would turn into the Baltimore of Kelvin Sewell.
Despite your yeoman work, PK, I have to disagree. The civil rights act did not do the damage that the great society did, with funding the breeding of the lowest order of Negro society. Civil rights act would have been a non-issue in an America not inundated with third world immigration as a result of the immigration reform act of 1965.

There was a decision made in the 1960s to end the USA, We can thank LBJ for it. But the "Great Society," including Medicaid, Medicare, AFDC reform, and immigration reform, was what did it. Without subsidizing the breeding of violent, poor Negroes, and importing a new underclass to compete with the Negroes who DID want to work, we would probably have been OK. not great, but OK.

Anonymous said...

"Margaret Johnson, a pioneer from the era of initial African American settlement in the same neighborhood, described her own feeling about the flight of her white neighbors: "They were friendly, but they were prejudiced. They didn't want to live where colored people did... They don't have to say it... They'd didn't tell you [why they moved]; they just moved."
Prejudice: from Latin praejudicium, from prae 'in advance' + judicium 'judgement'. No one can deny that those whites pre-judged their new neighbors with dead accuracy. Maybe if they weren't so friendly, they could have kept their neighborhoods.
Does anyone know the Latin roots for "rayciss"? I can't seem to find it online.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here....All these cities that have been lost to the African American Negroid Species is the same thing happening to the American South West with the South of the border Mexicans. Whole towns have been taken over. Crime is rampant. The drug gangs are doing in America what they did in Mexico and you hear nothing about it in the controlled media. The fudge packers in Hollywood need their coke fix. When I was living down there Ted Turner and his commie mommie girl friend were buying up huge tracks of land in the SW corner of New Mexico. I could rant all night about what was going on. Good bye America.

Anonymous said...

What the black woman who complains about whites moving away doesn't understand is that white and black cultures and behaviors are vastly different.
In her feeble minded way, she can only see it as a matter of prejudice when it's actually a matter of incompatibility on almost every level. It's not a matter of prejudice but of distaste for observed black conduct and behavior and a desire not to be subjected to it or have to put up with it or be around it. Just the one aspect of how the neighborhood decayed and became crappy once blacks moved in is enough (in and of itself) to make whites and others flee to live in a nice, clean, well kept neighborhood. When you add all the crime and other dysfunctions into the mix, no sane white people or other non black people (of any race) would stay.
In essence, her definition of prejudice is other races not accepting black culture and embracing it and all it's dysfunctions and unpleasantness. She sees everything only from her own narrow viewpoint and doesn't comprehend WHY others would flee.
That narrow viewpoint is also the reason why blacks can't understand why people in theaters wish they'd shut the fuck up and quit ruining the movie by being loud, boisterous and obnoxious. To them, it's normal and acceptable and they think you should accept it as well. If not, you got an attitude! You prejudiced! Ditto for the neighborhood being trashy and the houses/yards uncared for and unkempt. Why you got a attitude!?
That mentality and mindset precludes blacks from moving into a neighborhood and assimilating and going with the flow and getting along with anyone. It's always got to be all about them, what they want and what they get whether anyone likes it or not.
Is it any wonder that every other race on the planet says, "To hell with these mindless motherfuckers! We're outta here!"





Anonymous said...

Ex-Brooklynite, any one of those programs, alone, could not have wrecked this country. We have been slashed and stabbed by a thousand daggers. Civil Rights was one blade, Section Ape is another, Immigration is another, et cetera.

Billy said...

There was a reason for Jim Crow.

Anonymous said...

Ex-Brooklynite said ”Without subsidizing the breeding of violent, poor Negroes, and importing a new underclass to compete with the Negroes who DID want to work, we would probably have been OK. not great, but OK.”

Great point, and if true, it points to a good first step to recovery. We must stop subsidizing the breeding of violent Negroes and stop importing additional underclass in addition to expelling any non-citizen undertow whether here legally or illegally. We shouldn't allow anyone into our country who doesn't directly, measurably, and immediately improve the country. In other words, no third world undertow comes in for reasons such as increasing vibrant diversity. I know of no example where importing undertow improved anything.

Anonymous said...

Texas here.

Paul: Solid post. Thanks for this.

Some great turns of phrase, too: "the black mean," "the Baltimore of Marilyn Simkins would turn into the Baltimore of Kelvin Sewell." Nice.

Hey—any y'all up for some GOOD NEWS? I have found that if I say a certain something to people it has a good effect.

What I say is this: "I grew up in . There were many ethnic neighborhoods. The Italian neighborhood, the Chinese neighborhood, the black neighborhood, the Greek neighborhood, and so on. And one thing I noticed is that all the neighborhoods were equally poor. Yet when you drove through the German neighborhood, it was spotless. You would see people sweeping the street in front of their homes. It costs nothing to pick up litter. You also knew which neighborhoods were safe. Since then, I knew it was culture, not poverty, that determined people's behavior."

(I would argue that the culture is a reflection of genetics, but most people aren't ready to hear that, yet. Give it a few more years as what we know about DNA skyrockets.)

Anyway, saying that has pried several people's eyes a little more open. Nothing genius, but I thought I'd share what little I could.

Y'all have a great night!

DrAndroSF said...

The Civil Rights Act was pivotal. It made the Federal Government into the enforcer of the nation's conscience, State-as-Church, made the idea of any kind of state sovereignty at all nothing but a joke,and made any race-based grievance a matter of the highest moral moment, for which no cost or means is too much. All the damage from all the anti-discrimination laws and rules comes from there. It was a huge and fatal mistake.

Anonymous said...

PK, as you cited Baltimore's population census for each decade of mid. 20th century, an interesting paradox soon emerged.

Generally, America experienced very low crime rates nationwide from about the end of Prohibition to the mid. 60's, as the Civil Rights Movement was in full force and receiving its major legislative victories.

But as you note, the white population was moving out of Baltimore from 1950-1960. In other words, crime in and of itself was NOT the main reason since the crime rate was still very very low compared to what it would be in another 20yrs.

Therefore, while some of it could be explained that the post war boom (and with it the building of new suburbs) is what largely drove whites out of the cities in US, another factor largely unmentioned is that these whites left because they saw the writing on the wall: The face of Baltimore was rapidly changing too quickly. Therefore, it would be best if they vacated while they still could.

Clearly, the mass exodus of whites from Baltimore and other US cities from 1960 on is almost entirely directly caused by blacks and their problems (e.g. high crime; low IQ; etc).

But it is interesting to note that many whites started leaving even while the crime rates were still stable and quite low and certainly nothing like what they would become starting in the 60s.

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here. I know a retired college professor whose standard answer is "Whites do it too. White people commit crimes. In Boston when I grew up the Irish and Italians were the criminals."

Anonymous said...

Multi-faceted problem with plenty of blame to go around.Sooner or later the truth will have to be dealt with as sure as day follows night.There are too many race-hustlers and poverty pimps being enriched by all this nonsense.We all must talk to those we care about regarding race realities and do our best to prepare for the unthinkable.
Richard Cranium

10mm AUTO said...

""But Baltimore is apex of that violent strain. And thus the city begs the question: Are these people naturally amoral or prone to violence? Or, and this is a thought that bothers me more, is the violence I see here simply a payback for the years of neglect and cruelty we inflict upon the less fortunate?

Better put, are we civilized or can we ill afford to be civil? (p. 77)""

Poor Silwell. He is a half bright negro. Great at seeing the problem but unwilling to blame his own people for their own actions. It's not "payback", or poverty (Some of the nicest Whites I know are Poor in terms of money) or Karma or the Blu-eyed debil that is disturbing your nights, Stiwell. It is genetic. Black Genes.

Black people are a dysfunctional, violent, blood soaked, failed child race left behind by your betters; whom by unfortunate circumstance you find yourselves living amongst.

Twenty miles north of Baltimore negros don't slaughter each other because their are few if any negros. Wherever the negro congregates, evil grows like a wildflower. Get a neighborhood of negros together and you get dangerous dysfunction, dysfunction on a scale so bad you dare not raise White children in it, for they are taken from you.

Poor Animal, it sees but dares not comprehend.

Anonymous said...

Ex-Lincolnite here:

Really all we got from Civil Rights in 1964 is an unchecked violent mess. And that was always the goal. No one can look at modern America and not understand this fact.

They want to wear us down. And from my vantage point they are succeeding quite well. How many coal-burners do you see walking about on the arm of some simian? How many white men are unwilling to take the first step and rescue these gals? Not many. We have lost out this round. I say leave all urban areas. Make a move to a place that you can ride out the storm.

50 years ago America's death sentence was given. Now we can only wait and help pick up the pieces from the wreckage of Hurricane Negro.

Anonymous said...

There is no saving America - we must get this through our heads. There is no saving America, because there is no chance most people will ever wake up or speak up. Earlier generations let this happen, and the generation coming up now is completely jacked into the matrix 24/7, inundated by hip hop garbage "culture"; flivver-lipped simian ghetto thugs who mumble into a microphone about selling crack are looked at with the respect kings used to have. The chances these people are going to take a stand against what is going on are nil. They'd turn us in to the authorities for a free Egg McMuffin.

Anonymous said...

totally agree with this post. As a black guy, it pains me to admit it. I'm a software developer. I'm probably giving my identity away as there are so few black software developers. Blacks are collectively unable to build anything.

I'm a property owner/landlord in an East coast city not far from Baltimore. The things I've seen inside of black households makes me very pessimistic on the outlook of America.

Anonymous said...

Lower IQ, low impulse control, poor future time orientation. Genetically based. Negroes are physically incapable of assimilating into a White first world civilization due to the differences in their dna, and the outward manifestation of that difference via their behaviors. Very simple really. Like a wolf vs domesticated dog. Same forces of Nature at work. Yet the masses have been brainwashed and can't see this. Oh well...

Anonymous said...

While it's just one case and hardly makes the point for a pattern, I have an old file that predates the Civil Rights movement passing, that I should scan and post at some point.

I've mentioned it before on here - the story of the company house in western New York state, rented to a "colored" family which, while a father is present, he only works sporadically, and where as noted in one page although there are several sons of working age, they apparently choose not to work.

And again while it's just a single example, it's my opinion that there was just as many unwilling to work before the 1965 immigration act, as after it.

Anonymous said...

When Whites finally realize that the tyranny of BRA is largely self-imposed, we can throw off those chains & act...

http://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2014/04/final-stand-off.html

Organized Whiteness is a powerful thing to behold.

The pot is simmering & people are fed up. One single solitary spark can ignite this thing.

The PDK Herald/Crier Project said...

Wherever in the white man's higher culture of civilization the lowly negro invades, destruction, ruination and stagnation must ensue as his particular negro nature, gleaned from his own gene pool, has failed to endow him with the qualities or traits that are a prerequisite necessity for either the creation of, or the maintenance of, the aforementioned white man's higher culture of civilization.

The lowly negro is born of a more r selective gene pool. That is the gene pool his sub-species of human evolved with. The more r selective gene pool has favored quantity of numbers produced over quality of IQed cerebrum produced.

The lowly negro can no more change his behavior than wash the melanin from his skin.

Because the negro has bared witness to the white man's higher culture of civilization he wants in. The negro covets the cornucopia of all things produced by the white mans higher culture of civilization, which raises the quality of life so much higher than the lowly negro's, low culture of the primitive savage.

However though the negro wants in, he does not fit in.

The negro here in America, one of the lands of the white man's higher culture of civilization, senses out a duel objective. One for himself in the short run of a single lifespan by pilfering and parasitizing from the white man's culture. The other, a more long term goal of pilfering from the white gene pool so his posterity leapfrogs up the evolutionary ladder.

This is good for the negro, but horrible for whites.

Because the negro will not leave us, we must leave him. Because the negro will follow us we must block his path.

A new White Homeland is the ticket to our white destination.

We must eventually outlaw the negro and his champion and enabler, the white liberal apostate.

The world continues to turn, our sand falls through the hour glass, and our posterity hangs in the balance.

Shall we non-liberal, non-apostate whites embrace our responsibility?

For our posterity.

From the Sanctuary, I'm PDK: Thank you,

panjoomby said...

& lo, our people forgot the reason(s) for Jim Crow, & bad things came to pass. we will slowly learn again.

it's sad that we "celebrate" brown vs board of ed - we pat ourselves on the back for being "enlightened" while our cities & schools march toward 3rd world status.

we must begin to sort by group again (ability groups, etc.) curriculum fads in schools are a smokescreen - the reality is that school doesn't make people smarter. people are as smart as they're pre-set to be. we must get a better handle on reality as it is, not as we wish it to be.

Anonymous said...

"The condition of Baltimore today is a direct result of those black grandmothers' generation driving away white people, thereby ensuring the city would endure an Apocalypse God himself wouldn't condone."

Those black women raised generations of devils. And now they cover for them, aid, and abet them.

DWLs love to shoot the shit with old black people. Old blacks are "cool", they say. The old "civil rights" blacks are the most noble of all blacks to white liberals and white conservatives alike. No proof of nobility required, they get instant status with the first gray hair.

But look at their descendants. Look around at their filthy wretched ghettos. Their ebonics language. Look at all the things they have NEVER created as a population. Look at the money we have spent. Look at the degeneracy, the illegitimacy rates, the welfare abuse rates, the incarceration rates. Those old black "folks" raised these monsters. Because they were monsters themselves.

Paul is right...those harmless old black ladies still hate your white guts. They were the shoplifters of old, the single baby mommas, ghetto thugs, welfare queens, loud mouth, trash-talking, trouble on the bus-making young black women with huge racial chips on their shoulders. Now they have cell phones and Affirmative Action jobs and minority loans, but they are all cut from the same cloth.

Blacks are the same as they always were. Blacks have not changed, whites have changed their perceptions of blacks.

That's the problem.

Melanie said...

@Ex-Lincolnite-

"Hurricane Negro"! LOl! I love it, it's perfect!

Anonymous said...

Do blacks have anything better than to continuously says "thats/your racist(s)"?

Change the record...

Anonymous said...

Paul, I hope you post this. Let me tell you how different we are from the blacks. I am prejudiced against blacks BECAUSE live near them.

My city is experiencing warm, spring days. End of the winter cold means several things if you in the inner-city. If you live with blacks, you can GUARANTEE most of the following will occur:

- $400 portable basketball goals rolled into the streets, anchored by cinder blocks. Never moved. Eventually they get broken and fall into pieces everywhere. Shirtless black males balling, blocking traffic, bouncing balls, whooping and hollering from noon until midnight on weekdays, later on weekends. HUGE crowds gather. Sometimes over 20 men gather. Police won't break this up, often won't respond to calls. Often there are fights and intimidation. I often wonder if the city provides these free to the youths.
-Cruising. Blacks park in empty lots and sit on their hoods to be "seen" by other blacks and show off their ghetto cars on weekend nights.
- Constant rap music blaring from hoopty cars. (We call them "Thugosaurus.") Constant booming base coming from somewhere around, you just don't know where but it rots your brain. It's difficult to sleep with the windows open because blacks cruise and wild all night and sleep all day.
-Rotten, stinking bins of garbage. Blacks don't take their trash out on time (7am) because that requires future time orientation. Blacks produce three times as much garbage as whites, in my experience. So the trash sits for weeks, stinking and rotten, until the bin overflows and stray dogs open and spread it all over the neighborhood.
-Vans of white social workers on regular home visitations. They have to make sure that the black women are feeding their children and not abusing them.
-Door-to-door solicitors. Black Jehova's Witness, inner-city youth, looking for work or bus money, "Do Pooty and them still stay here?", police serving warrants, etc. I have locks on my gates now.
-Motorcycle drag-racing at 2am on public streets. Police are nowhere to be found.
- Regular gunfire.
-DWLs with shovels, corporate volunteers raking leaves and collecting trash. I think they get a "volunteerism" tax break.
-Hideous, full-color urban murals painted on concrete walls and sides of abandoned buildings. Thanks to the DWLs.
-Unlicensed home daycare. These houses take in 20 black children sometimes. All take AFDC welfare. Kids are running and screaming everywhere and tearing things up.
-New section 8 neighbors you didn't know about. You get a new batch of them every 6 months and never know who is living there, or how many are living there. They bring with them domestic violence and iinoperable vehicles to park on blocks for the duration of their stay.
-Constant police sirens. Black women call the fire department when they go into labor. I've never figured this one out. Must be a secret black government "program."
- High weeds and grass, blowing trash, and illegal trash dumping on empty lots and behind businesses.
-Abandoned and inoperable vehicles. When they can't make the payments or something breaks, they ditch the car on the side of the road, where it sits there for weeks before it is towed.
- Increase in burglary and auto theft. Black thugs burglarized my neighbor (a gay, DWL, local business owner and home-owner), four times before he finally moved...continued...

Anonymous said...

...continuted...

-Gang graffiti. They spray everything, including trees and sidewalks. No one removes the tags, so it just builds up over time.
-Front porch scalp greasing/braiding sessions. Yuck.
-Drug dealers. They stand on corners and in alleyways soliciting cars.
-Prostitutes. They screw in back seats of cars on residential streets. We call them Walkers. Many black women will turn sex tricks to get their hair and nails done. I once saw one dip a cup in a mud puddle and take a drink after a rainstorm. These foul creatures start up business when the weather gets warm. While walking my dogs, I often find a single pile of blue vinyl gloves, baby wipes, a gum wrapper and a used condom and wrapper. That means something dirty just took place.
-Packs of unattended, troublesome black children. Some as young as 3, some teen girls with babies in strollers. They roam about vandalizing property, trespassing, yelling, fighting, blocking traffic, throwing rocks, kicking cars, causing a nuisance. This goes on all summer long until school starts again.
-If you live in the path of a convenience store or gas station, you have constant Walker traffic. This is where they swipe their EBT card for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. And then eat and throw their single-serving wrappers on the ground all the way home.
-Stray dogs, puppies, kittens, animal neglect, dogs tied to trees with belts.
-When it is hot, blacks sit on stoops all day, or under trees on public property, drinking liquor out of bags.

Blacks see nothing wrong with any of the above. It is part of their culture. Even "middle-class" blacks go back to the "hood" to see Big Momma because it is WHO THEY ARE TO THEIR CORE. They love it.

I can understand why most whites would not want to experience any of this AND know that they are funding their own dispossession. Whites should be prejudiced as self-preservation.

Blacks don't know how degenerate they are, because they live a life isolated from whites.

Anonymous said...

10mm AUTO said...

"Black people are a dysfunctional, violent, blood soaked, failed child race left behind by your betters..."

It may be too early for "Best Comment of the Week," but this will be a difficult (if not impossible) one to top.

--NB

Anonymous said...

I get sick of the self-hating conservative whites who complain about slavery, segregation and Jim Crow.

How are the blacks doing now compared to then, assholes? How many of them are in prison? Unmarried with illegitimate offspring? How convenient that there is no ROI report available to prove that ending segregation was a mistake for everyone, but mostly for whites.

How much wealth has been extracted from our families?

The Repukes are now pushing school vouchers and "school choice" for the low-income/outcome blacks. That is forced integration all over again, and we have to pay for it.

The half-wit Repukes don't live anywhere near ghetto blacks. I hate THESE bastards more than I hate the Progs. The deserve everything they are about to get. I think I would have voted Dem back in the 1950's. I am pretty sure about that.

Anonymous said...

Paul,

You do yeoman work, but I don't share your optimism. Another poster noted that the key act was the 1965 Immigration Act and I think he's right. When the white/black ratio was 8:1, crime and race could be dealt with in a way that could protect most Americans. But now, when the ratio is 4:1 and when America is in the process of being flooded with non-Americans from the global south - it's quite literally a colonization - these issues are unresolvable because there is no common American culture. I'm sorry, but the elites hate the American people and right now, I see very little hope as Obama floods the country with third world immigrants on purpose. We gave away the greatest country on earth and there is no turning back. We are quite literally strangers amongst ourselves. It is depressing.

And the GOP - my party - is dumber than words. Even Ted Cruz, who I held out hope for - is for increasing legal immigration. I'm sick of hearing about amnesty - which if of course horrible, but the real problem is legal immigration from the third world. What we should do - something that Rick Santorum perhaps hints about - is even though the most important effects of unlimited third world immigration are cultural, for political reasons, we should focus on the employment effects of immigration and try to get an immigration moratorium as long as the unemployment rate is above 4% or so. This is a winning issue for the GOP - but we're so dumb that no one except Senator Sessions will talk about it.

A friend of mine always said, the US is just 10 years behind the UK. And it's true. Our evangelicals are fading and we are seeing population replacement of the historic American nation. We're even importing Muslims, which is so beyond the pale that it depresses on a daily basis. I weep for America's future. - A Former GOP Cheerleader

Anonymous said...

I still think Paul Kersey's argument is valid but you do make an excellent point!

Anonymous said...

So Im reading comments about the Kansas shooting on USA Today and your typical ignorant groid Leaves this gem of a comment.


Natorrey Emory
"White ppL has always been violent in this country. Its unfortunate that media doesn't report these type of behavior to the world. Mas shootings are common among whites"


Boy, I reallyyyyyy cant stand these people..I mean im getting to the breaking point.

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here, By the way, the DWL ex-college professor I referenced in my above comment lives in an all white neighborhood far away from the black section of town.

Anonymous said...

"How many white men are unwilling to take the first step and rescue these gals? Not many. We have lost out this round."

Haha, not one of them is. SO WHY NOT JUST STAND BY AND WATCH THE TRAIN WRECK, DAD? Pop some popcorn. Get cozy.

What is the first step to "rescue" these poor girls from the Marxist indoctrination cult of lies? Who cares about girls anyway? You don't want to take your rightful place as head of the family. That's not gonna happen. You are too fat and lazy now. You threw in the towel long ago.

Clearly hite men have zero influence over white women. 47% of white women voted for a black president. There is a huge "Manosphere" movement of single, lonely, borderline gay white males, who are blogging about how to "game" your 17 year-old daughter into giving them a blow job on the first date. No dads anywhere to be found.

These are your wives, and your daughters. And white men are currently neglecting a new generation of white daughters, many of whom will become the next generation of traitorous race-mixers. You dad's are all hooked to the screen watching negro men bounce balls around instead of teaching her that YOU were to be admired. YOU taught her that strong, alpha black men were superior gods. YOU did that.

White men's insanity is just like the Muslim men's insanity. Muslim men blame their women for getting raped, and then publicly stone them to death. White men fail to provide leadership, neglect their family responsibilities, worship civil rights negroes, Walter Williams, Ben Carson, and black athletes, and then blame their white daughters for getting eaten alive by the wolves as a result of being DIRECTLY THROWN TO THEM.

REMEMBER, DAD. YOU THREW HER TO THE WOLVES IN THE FIRST PLACE. What a waste.

I don't expect white men to fight for anything anymore:

Gregory Hood doesn't either. http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/01/beltway-rambos/

Anonymous said...

Blacks denied service at gun range.

http://www.myfoxchicago.com/story/25197491/three-men-claim-racial-discrimination-after-being-denied-service-at-gun-range

Mr. Rational said...

As a black guy, it pains me to admit it. I'm a software developer. I'm probably giving my identity away as there are so few black software developers. Blacks are collectively unable to build anything.

Go tell Eric Raymond what you just told us.  He has trouble believing that there's anything like a Black undertow.  If he heard it from a Black software developer, he just might not dismiss it as racist slander.

Anonymous said...

Of course he does.

NORDIC CAUCASOID said...

GREATWHITES,

Quoting black Margaret Johnson a "pioneer" no less from the era of initial african american's settlement in that old white neighborhood described her feelings about the white flight.
"They were prejudiced they didn't want to live where colored people did. They don't have to say it they didn't tell you why they moved; They just moved"!

First things first like P.K. say's "We owe them nothing" GREATWHITES. And we sure the hell didn't have to tell them why we moved away from that old Baltimore suburb. At that time it still was America damn it. And if white people want to sell their property then they have every right. It's a free country to do what you please as long as it's law abiding for Christ's sake.
And isn't it funny how when blacks such as Mr. Spike Leroy say's we don't want your kind doing that gentrification thing that's as prejudiced as the whites saying that they don't want to live amongst coloreds. Right Margaret Johnson?

Just as we all know at this "pioneering blog-site" SBPDL It's ok for the blacks to do the same damn thing that whites did back in the day! But boy oh boy us whites are so racist for that! And these "coloreds" get a pass for doing the exact same thing and the only thing different is how much time has passed between their excused prejudice!

GODSPEED/SEGREGATION NATION!!!

Harry in PA said...

Anonymous said...There is no saving America - we must get this through our heads. There is no saving America, because there is no chance most people will ever wake up or speak up. Earlier generations let this happen, and the generation coming up now is completely jacked into the matrix 24/7, inundated by hip hop garbage "culture"; flivver-lipped simian ghetto thugs who mumble into a microphone about selling crack are looked at with the respect kings used to have. The chances these people are going to take a stand against what is going on are nil. They'd turn us in to the authorities for a free Egg McMuffin.April 13, 2014 at 11:29 PM

Hate to admit it (it lets the wind of rage out of my sails) but your comment stood out as the "ring-of-truth" in all its dark despair. I indeed hope-against-hope but that is playing the long, long odds. The managable wave of the mid-60's has become the tsunami of BRA. No sooner was the CRA American policy then the degeneracy, murderous, and mindlessness of the negro savage burst onto the national scene with vast rioting and rage-filled demands.

A rational people would have immedeately recognized the awful, AWFUL mistake they had made - lynched the elites that brought it forth and hie'd back to a strict (stricter) racialist ethos. But they apparently were by that time already an emasculated people.

And what have we now after 50 years of black horror (with the added plague of third-world-immigration)? - universal negro worship with its premier doctrine of a glorious white self-immolation.

Did I mention that I was still hoping-against-hope?

Anonymous said...

Sounds like more black whining and bitching.

If the guy doesnt want you at his gun range why would you want to be there? So of course they have to make a scene and call the news up.

Lionel said...

Everyone needs to buy food but big supermarket companies will not locate in the black areas of cities. Baltimore has a huge new Harris Teeter but its all the way down at the other end from the black areas.

Alan Dershowitz was on CNN discussing the Pistorius trial and he called South Africa a "failed state." He used as an example that you don't stop at red lights in South Africa for fear of being carjacked. Baltimore is the same! There are areas of Baltimore that you don't stop at red lights once its dark out.

Eric Holder, Barack and Michelle Obama, Oprah Winfrey, etc. etc. - all of them love to express anger at white people over some kind of grievance even though they've lived lives of privilege. White people should feel ANGRY at what black people have done in this country. Black people destroy and make cities dangerous and nasty. They do it; has nothing to do with white people.

Anonymous said...

Do you blame the gun range owner!?!?!

I mean blacks are the main cause of gun violence in the city of Chicago. I dont blame the man for being a little hostile..hes fed up like everyone else.

One Pissed Off Irishman said...

Yeah St. Louis was no better, now all I see down south are blacks and their race traitor white girlfriends, brown squat monsters, and an ever increasing homosexual "revolution". I've looked far and wide for affordable housing in a nice white city. but I lost my job last month so, I can't even support myself anymore. I tried so hard here in the States, but I can't do it anymore. I'm moving to Ireland this fall. I'm going to try and find work on a fishing boat, I have a couple of 3rd cousins in Dundalk who are connected with the local east coast fisherman. Wish me luck.

I sympathize with every man and women here on this site, and my advice is...move back to Europe...I'm sorry I couldn't do more for my fellow whites here in the U.S. I've tried so hard. God knows the compassion I have for my people, and now I think it's time I return to the birthplace of my genetic heritage. Please don't think of my as a traitor or coward, because this nation threw me overboard before I was even born in '89. We've all been thrown overboard, and Baltimore, Detroit, and St. Louis are just the tip of the anti-white iceberg. If anyone here feels as I do, about our people, our families, and our future, let us help in reclaiming the lands of our ancestors.

-David William aka One Pissed Off Irishman.

Anonymous said...

Are you black lionel? Good comment by the way.

Anonymous said...

There are many who don't believe that blacks can ever co-exist with whites. I offer the argument that it is indeed possible.

Several years ago my family had a number of farm animals including chickens. We obtained a fairly large dog for the children and to serve as a watchdog. Unfortunately, he regularly killed chickens which we allowed to run free during the day. I whipped him soundly after every incident, but he continued killing chickens. It was common knowledge among my neighbors, friends, and other people giving advice that once a dog starts killing chickens it cannot be stopped. One day I came home and found a couple of dead chickens and decided that I was going to kill the dog. I took him away from the house so the children wouldn't watch, aimed at his head, but couldn't bring myself to pull the trigger without one last attempt to correct him. I called a professional dog trainer and asked her if she could correct the dog. She assured me that the dog could be corrected, but she would not do it. I asked her why, and she explained that I would have to make the dog understand that the chickens are mine and that he cannot bother my possessions. She explained that I would have to use a level of force sufficient to get this point across and that she didn't want to do it. I asked her how much force, and she replied that it would probably take as much as I was willing to administer.

Soon the dog killed a large rooster. I restrained the dog and commenced beating him with the dead rooster as hard as I could beat him. I continued to beat him about the head and shoulders for at least 5 continuous minutes while he was shrieking, trying to bite me, and trying to escape. I beat him until there was nothing left of the chicken to beat him with and until I was gasping for air from the exertion. I let him loose and he ran away from me as fast as he could run.

His change of attitude was immediate and astounding. Not only did he never kill another chicken, he protected them from predators and even from each other. If two roosters were fighting, that dog would get between them to make them stop. He actually became a superb chicken dog.

He probably had an IQ of a two year old, possessed no future time orientation, had a natural instinct to kill chickens, yet after he saw the light he got with the program. Without a doubt he had the lowest IQ in the family, and we had to support him for his entire life, but he contributed as much as his dog brain would permit. He was almost like a member of the family, and I missed him after he died.

If I had administered the beating in public, because of PC and a misguided belief by some that dogs are equal to people, someone would have reported me to the authorities for cruelty to animals, and quite likely I would have been charged with a felony. But I acted against popular wisdom, and things worked out well.

I honestly believe that the negroid, notwithstanding his low IQ and violent nature, is capable of peaceful coexistence with whites and modern civilization although not within our current politically correct legal framework which requires everyone to believe that all races of people are equally able to accomplish the same things. We must act against popular wisdom in a legal manner and abolish all forms of affirmative action thereby requiring everyone to succeed on their own merit. We must then quit subsidizing non-productive members of our society other than truly disabled persons who are disabled due to no fault of their own. The productive members of our society will succeed and will always have to support large numbers of blacks, but it would be bearable if the blacks would contribute as much as their African brains will permit. As long as we have AA which artificially pushes blacks above their functional capacity regardless of their bad behavior and incompetency while overlooking their criminal behavior, and as long as we continue to subsidize undeserving undertow they will not see the light.

Anonymous said...

Is it fair to assume,prior to 1964 white people had seen blacks in action,hence im out of here.
years ago my friends and I used to go across to Dearborn Mich,to play soccer against the arab team,if we scored or won the game,they would be nearly killing each other ,you couldn't believe there attitude

Anonymous said...

Sounds like you lived in the hood..

Anonymous said...

Excellent post!

Anonymous said...

Harry in PA said...
Anonymous said...There is no saving America...

A rational people would have immedeately recognized the awful, AWFUL mistake they had made - lynched the elites that brought it forth…


The political, media and academic elite are always blameless. They have and will continue to back disastrous decisions, implement destructive policy and advocate ideas that are deadly. They will do that on behalf of the masses and their ideas will not only fail, but lead to throughly unnecessary misery for the common guy.

Our present arrangement leaves them untouchable. Government functionaries are not fired, on occasion they may not be re-elected, but they quickly move into other government related sinecures. Academics have tenure, as completely incomprehensible as that arrangement is. Your ordinary cop might kill a citizen unnecessarily. Is he punished? No, the tax payers pay the injured party.

When a politician pushing some law is convinced that if that law leads to disaster, not only will he pay a price, but every member of his family, including those not yet born, will pay dearly. Then the status quo will change. Until then, no matter what they do to us, they remain fat, free and happy.

Bogolyubski said...

Anon:
And the GOP - my party - is dumber than words. Even Ted Cruz, who I held out hope for - is for increasing legal immigration. I'm sick of hearing about amnesty - which if of course horrible, but the real problem is legal immigration from the third world. What we should do - something that Rick Santorum perhaps hints about - is even though the most important effects of unlimited third world immigration are cultural, for political reasons, we should focus on the employment effects of immigration and try to get an immigration moratorium as long as the unemployment rate is above 4% or so. This is a winning issue for the GOP - but we're so dumb that no one except Senator Sessions will talk about it.

A friend of mine always said, the US is just 10 years behind the UK. And it's true. Our evangelicals are fading and we are seeing population replacement of the historic American nation. We're even importing Muslims, which is so beyond the pale that it depresses on a daily basis. I weep for America's future. - A Former GOP Cheerleader


Ironically, the fact that you managed to stop willing the grape-drank being sold by the Gay Old Pedos is one of the few points of optimism to be found. Most of us were there at one point, me included (and I regularly savage the Repukes, conservatives, Tea-Party 'Tards and Christians). You'll note I rarely if ever waste the keystrokes on leftists or negroes - nearly all of them are past the point of no return.

To yet again quote the polite Nigerian Musloid with hands scarlet from sawing off the head of a hapless white Brit who faithfully served his cephalopod overlords in their racketeering over the blood-soaked poppyfields of Pashttonistan:

Remove your governments. They are not for you.

I've been chided for using this remark before - not altogether unjustly as there are indeed volumes of far more eloquent statements to the same effect made by whites of the past whose boots all of us would be unworthy of shining.

Problem is, after a century or more of concentrated, coordinated effort to stupefy and dumb-down the white populace via public edumacation, controlled opposition, shit-sandwiches and grape-drank ranging from sports to exalted artsy-farts, most YT can't even comprehend the profound utterances of those old DWMs, thus I resort to the modern-day equivalent of Baalam's Jackass (a biblical account, for the public edumacated) to get the urgent message across.

The hapless Brit was a tragic example of one who fell for the lie. He was sent halfway around the planet to fight Pashtun goat-humpers so the squids could fatten their already bloated bottom lines - somehow thinking he was protecting his native land - which has been systematically colonized and disarmed by the same Banksteins who've owned the place since at least Waterloo. The same applies to anyone who dons the uniform of the Banskta Banana Republick.

Bogolyubski said...

Pissed off Irishman:
I sympathize with every man and women here on this site, and my advice is...move back to Europe...I'm sorry I couldn't do more for my fellow whites here in the U.S. I've tried so hard. God knows the compassion I have for my people, and now I think it's time I return to the birthplace of my genetic heritage. Please don't think of my as a traitor or coward, because this nation threw me overboard before I was even born in '89. We've all been thrown overboard, and Baltimore, Detroit, and St. Louis are just the tip of the anti-white iceberg. If anyone here feels as I do, about our people, our families, and our future, let us help in reclaiming the lands of our ancestors.

I wish you the best of luck. You need to be aware of a couple of things (if you are not already):

1. Ireland has been heavily invaded by negroes, and the native girls there are indoctrinated with the same anti-racist Crystal Methodist dogma you see here. I even recall a case from about 18 months ago where an Irish girl studying in Japan (a place relatively free of the groid) paid money to attend a "hip-hip" event by an aspiring USSA rapper, went to his room with an Irish girlfriend to "party" (e.g. to have sex) and ended up dead.

2. Ireland is a province of the EUSSR and thus is directly under the control of the squids, whose plan is to exterminate the Irish (along with all other whites). Most Irish - who managed to survive some actual brutal treatment from the English in centuries past - seem to be going along willingly with the plan for their extermination. The local overseer of the genocide is (suprise!), a TWMNBN name Shatter.

3. As part of the EUSSR, there is a full panoply of hate speech, hate thought laws, which will be enforced by the Garda (the national police there). Gun control is another feature, so you're ability to protect yourself from the groid is very limited.

But, perhaps an opportunity will open and you'll be able to open a lot of eyes there before it's too late. So my very best wishes go with you.

Anonymous said...

Who is going to save the white girls?

Who is going to protect them from black undertow schools, daddy issues, black boys making comments about their nice booty? Shield them from the Feminist message that white men are evil, racist, sexists, from booze and drug induced college orgies, from pregnancy, from the message that Western Civilization is oppressive, and kills and starves the world's brown people?

Do you know how many white Christian dads have sent their precious white daughters to the Congo to spread the word of Jesus Christ? Do you know how many never came home?

Who will protect the chastity and virtue of our young women? Who will protect them from mental and physical rape?

Which man is going to do the hard work in this multi-culti, anti-white society and save the white girls? Women are most vulnerable to these messages. Their egalitarian, sensitive natures are under assault.

Remember those commercials in the 90s, where the young white boy said, "If you don't teach your daughter about sex...I will." Well, he meant that. And those aggressive black boys want to teach your white daughter something too.

Major1 said...

You have to hand it to Officer Sewell. At least he acknowledges that there is a problem.
I believe that he knows what the cause of that problem is, too. He almost says it...then he remembers Eric Holder's admonition..."you don't want to go there, buddy!"

So he disingenuously retreats behind a veil of feigned ignorance and asserts that he cannot understand why the suburbs surrounding Baltimore aren't homicidal free-for-alls.

Then, like all black apologists and their liberal white slave masters, he reverses cause and effect, blaming the sense of hopelessness and despair for chronic black dysfunction. Of course, as is demonstrated every day across what's left of our country, intrinsic black pathological behavior is the cause of the apocalyptic despair that fills every crevice of our inner cities.

Excellent reporting. Deep stuff.

How did you attack the narrative today? I told a couple of people about the white dude who got out of his car to help the boy he hit with his car and was stomped into a coma by a feral black mob. They hadn't heard about it but they have now.

Vicio Malo said...

I have posted this before...what do you people expect from the negro? In a society that is acceptable with white people, what are your expectations from the negroes? I expect illegal Mexicans to pick crops, cut rich people's lawns, cook at the local taquiria...and I am never let down. What do you people have in mind for the negroes? The only thing that comes to mind for me is...reverend and race baiter...please add to my list so I can feel like they have a future...VM

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here.....In the old days they were called COLORED PEOPLE and that became a racist term. Now they want to be called PEOPLE OF COLOR.

The reason I don't vote for Republicans is they spend their time SPREADING DEMOCRACY. The time has come again for the Republicans to save us from the Democrats. But now there's a new wave of Republican that will also be saving us from the Republicans. This shit just get's weirder by the day.

Anonymous said...

""""Is it fair to assume,prior to 1964 white people had seen blacks in action""""


In the South, YES. The rest of the country, NO. NO, it is NOT "fair to assume" that whites had any real idea of groid action.

They were around here and there, but not as spread out. Now, you almost can't escape it.

See, if the Civil Rights and Voting Rights had stopped right there? AND NOTHING ELSE, POLICY WISE (No AA; no set asides; no quotas; etc) that would more or less have been fine with most people.

Because only the 'talented tenth' of blacks would've been able to make use of their opportunities that the Civil Rights Act afforded them. The ordinary groid, low IQ, low impulse, high crime, keepin' it real, DID NOT DIRECTLY BENEFIT from the Civil Rights Act per se.

They really benefitted from Affirmative Action, set asides, quotas and the entire jurisprudence written into federal law just for them.

If not for AA, Trayvon Martin types would be in jail quicker and for longer stretches of time.

Have to consider that 50 yrs ago, in the backdrop of extremely low crime rates, a fairly good economy, that there was a lot of BS out there that many good folks truly believed in their heart. "I have a dream"---lots of white truly beileved in that idea. So they decided to help the Civil Rights Act out with Affirmative Action.

But again: if the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act was left as is and NOTHING ELSE, POLICY WISE, white society would've been 90% intact nearly no difference from pre-Civil Rights era to now. Really, because only the top 10% of blacks would've made good use of their opportunities.

That's why you see top black conservatives like Walter Williams and Thomas Sowell so strongly vs Affirmative Action and all the other junk; cause they don't want to be lumped in with all the rest of the groids.

It was Affirmative Action and all the entire Federal jurisprudence written into law explicitly for the groids that is the direct result of all the racial problems that we see today.

Anonymous said...

>>>Anonymous said:
""""I honestly believe that the negroid, notwithstanding his low IQ and violent nature, is capable of peaceful coexistence with whites and modern civilization"""""




This is an interesting concept, and in theory you could well prove to be correct. However, in the world here and now as it is there are a couple of strong barriers preventing this from ever becoming a reality.

First, there is the cultural aspects of the undertow, that strongly disdains in their very marrow of life anything that remotely resembles "acting white". This list is ever increasing all the time, until it includes all aspects of wanting to learn, work for a living, etc. Never forget that to the groids the cultural aspects are strongly imbedded into their DNA almost at birth. Notice how those few who are adopted by white families nowadays and are raised among whites and afforded many of the same material blessings, in many cases they STILL tend to revert to type: First chance they get, they tend to act a la 'keepin' it real'.

Second, with each passing decade, it becomes that much harder for blacks to coexist with modern civilization, especially if the cultural aspects tend to reinforce that of his own DNA; namely, that YT is the problem 100% of the time.

With this backdrop, why should blacks listen to anyone, let alone people within their own group?

This is the reality we face. For the undertow, each successive decade where they do not assimilate or learn the rudiments of how to assimilate means that it will continue to grow worse and that much harder for assimilation.

This is especially true when their own culture constantly and consistently reinforces them not to "act white".

Yes, the talented tenth will always (more or less) learn how to assimilate. But these blacks over time will become rarer and rarer. The majority, meanwhile, will only increase and breed even more of its undesirable traits into the next generation.

Californian said...

"Margaret Johnson, a pioneer from the era of initial African American settlement in the same neighborhood, described her own feeling about the flight of her white neighbors: "They were friendly, but they were prejudiced. They didn't want to live where colored people did... They don't have to say it... They'd didn't tell you [why they moved]; they just moved."

OK, Margaret Johnson, I'll tell you "why they moved:"
* high black crime rates;
* high black neighborhood trashing rates;
* high black illegitimacy rates;
* high black school drop out rates which drag down white students;
* high black hustling for welfare, affirmative action and cons like black history month;
* ...and most critically: instead of recognizing the above, blacks scream "prejudice" when someone tries to tell them the truth.

The point is, blacks have this mindblock when it comes to recognizing that it is their own collective dysfunctional behaviors which drive people away. Maybe in their own brains they see nothing wrong with what they are doing. Maybe because the DWL agitprop machine tells blacks that they are saintly beings so they must blame others for bailing out.

But it is a reality that wherever blacks show up in large numbers, other races tend to migrate away. True in Baltimore. True throughout the Homeland. True now in Europa. (OK, we will make an exception for third world gangbangers who defend their neighborhoods against black encroachment.)

This is why segregation was put into force. It's not because of how blacks act as individuals (which can be as upstanding as whites), but because of their collective behaviors. And the worst part is, blacks refuse to recognize that what they are doing is wrong.

Same planet, different world.

Thus endeth the sermon!

Anonymous said...

>>>Vicio Malo said...
""""what do you people expect from the negro?""""

30 yrs ago? To follow the laws of society that everyone else does (e.g. stay out of jail; keep their zippers up; go to work; become responsible members of society). In 2014? The question is moot.


""""I expect illegal Mexicans to pick crops, cut rich people's lawns, cook at the local taquiria...and I am never let down.""""

Then you have extremely expectations. I expect illegal Mexicans to go home. If they won't voluntarily, then I want them deported and by force if necessary. Also, I want a BORDER FENCE built on the entire US side of the Rio Grande, about a 50 FT high FENCE.

I admit that my expectations are high, but Americans historically have been known to rise to the level of their expectations.





"""What do you people have in mind for the negroes?"""""


Honestly, the question is so moot at this point in time. There's over half a century of data and statistics in that simply shows what can be realistically expected by them, which is to say, next to nil.

I suppose what we should consider doing is, as always, build more prisons and with FEWER additional amenities. Dont make it too comfortable for them since, you know, it is supposed to be prison.



"""The only thing that comes to mind for me is...reverend and race baiter...please add to my list so I can feel like they have a future...VM""""


Oh, how about criminal; murderer; rapist; all out otherwise thug; OH! And also career criminal, don't forget that one.

Californian said...

There are many who don't believe that blacks can ever co-exist with whites. I offer the argument that it is indeed possible.

Small colonial elites of white people were able to control large black populaces throughout much of Africa. They also got blacks to be reasonably productive and show some respect for the law. Same point could be made about the USA during segregation. When the white man/woman has the will to power, blacks get into line and act with a modicum of civilization.

But here's the thing...why go through all this trouble?

If whites want to co-exist, then they can co-exist better with races other than blacks or, even better, in their own national (whites only) states. And if white people do want to expand into other lands, then they should amp up their own numbers to displace the natives, making themselves into the majority and thus not having to go through all sorts of convolutions to maintain a modicum of civilized behavior by blacks.

A point made to me by many white South Africans was that their big mistake was that they did follow the American policy towards the Indians: i.e., displace the native population and open the country to mass European migration. Instead, they built up hospitals and schools and food distribution for black Africans with the result that the latter numbers exploded to the point where they overwhelmed the whites.



Alan Dershowitz was on CNN discussing the Pistorius trial and he called South Africa a "failed state." He used as an example that you don't stop at red lights in South Africa for fear of being carjacked.


I was in SA a couple times when apartheid was in force. At that time there was no fear of stopping for red lights. If one failed to do so, the police would be on your tail in a hurry!


Baltimore is the same! There are areas of Baltimore that you don't stop at red lights once its dark out.

Baltimore, Johannesburg, Port au Prince, Kinshasha...different cities, different continents, but same race and same behaviors.

Anonymous said...

Another reason to stay away from black populations - affirmative action. I would like to be judged by the content of my character. The white male is at the back of the line at the Federal trough.

Taurus from the bunker.

Anonymous said...

Some of you may remember a "catchy" tune from the 60s called the "Name Game" or the "Banana Song". We, the wife and I, do it often and here's a variation on our favorite verse. Performed by a sistah name of Shirley Ellis and made it to #3 on the charts. I leave it to your imagination to fill in the missing syllable (s).
Ger, ger, bo-ber, banana fanna fo fer, fee fi mo mer. Ger!

Anonymous said...

Its funny but this shooting in St Louis, I am not hearing a lot of the tribe or priest saying much about forgiveness. After all the MSM is saying that he was an ex-Klan member, so obviously he was turning life around and was a good person at heart. Funny how that works.

Anonymous said...

OT: This is good ==>Freedom and Race:

http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2014/04/freedom-and-race.html

Anonymous said...

Un-fucking- real,isn't it ?
Richard Cranium

Anonymous said...

Very true.Those rotten old women completely ignore and co-sign for the outrageous behavior of the ' yoofs'.Shameful .

CENTURION said...

As for Baltiomore, Whites, housing and racism:

Those Whites who were the most racists and left as soon as they could, sold their homes for the highest price.

Racism not only keeps you alive, it pays !!!!

Anonymous said...

"Prejudice: from Latin praejudicium, from prae 'in advance' + judicium 'judgement'. No one can deny that those whites pre-judged their new neighbors with dead accuracy. Maybe if they weren't so friendly, they could have kept their neighborhoods." - the ones who stayed and tried to make it work but who were ultimately driven out are guilty of postjudice.

"But it is interesting to note that many whites started leaving even while the crime rates were still stable and quite low and certainly nothing like what they would become starting in the 60s." - future time orientation.

Anonymous said...

He a good boy, he didn't do nuffin. He go to church an' play de midnite bassaball.

He gwine be NBA, sho' 'nuf!

Of course, if he does hit the "ghetto lottery" and plays pro, lack of future-time orientation will accurately predict his being penniless by age 40.

Gwinnett Gladiator said...

You have described my former neighborhood, where I had to short sell to get out, as if you directly channeled all my thoughts and experiences.

GG

Chuck Hammer said...

David William aka One Pissed Off Irishman, please e-mail Paul Kersey at sbpdl1@gmail.com. I will do what I can to help you.

Vicio Malo said...

Hello Gwinnett Gladiator...I depend on you for my updates...I lived in Gwinnett county for 25 years moved to Jackson County...then to Banks County...I lived in Duluth when you never saw a negro...when the started pushing for MARTA in gwinnett...I moved...and moved again even further out...when Gwinett Place Mall was opened they said they needed cheap labor...and pushed for MARTA...it just opened the door for more of the same. When I moved to Georgia there was 3 metro counties...Fulton, DeKalb and Clayton. It was a wonderful city...when I left it was 15 metro counties and truly a shit hole...what happened? oh I know the negroes moved back from the rust belt...VM

Vicio Malo said...

to GG...I lived in Mountain View, GA. until the airport authority bulldozed the whole city. Just down the street from the Ruff 'n' Ready Tavern, before it burned down. It was white in the early 70s. Virginia Ave. Morrow... the Fish King...you never saw any blacks. Not even at the Waffle House on Old Dixie Hwy. What a difference a day makes I went to the Kroger at the Mall on Jonesboro Rd. in 1990, it was like being parachuted into some shit hole in Africa. I currently live in Maryland. Baltimore is just over the bay bridge. I don't go there. I stay on the Delmarva Peninsula. Been to DC never again, been to Baltimore, never again...been to Killadelphia...never again...my girlfriend has 2 adult sons that live in Killadelphia, she shows me homes they are interested in. Completely ghetto...why any educated white person would consider ghetto living is beyond me...but to each his own...I reckon I'll stay home and witness from afar...VM

Bogolyubski said...

Anon asks:
Who is going to save the white girls?

Who is going to protect them from black undertow schools, daddy issues, black boys making comments about their nice booty? Shield them from the Feminist message that white men are evil, racist, sexists, from booze and drug induced college orgies, from pregnancy, from the message that Western Civilization is oppressive, and kills and starves the world's brown people?

Do you know how many white Christian dads have sent their precious white daughters to the Congo to spread the word of Jesus Christ? Do you know how many never came home?

Who will protect the chastity and virtue of our young women? Who will protect them from mental and physical rape?

Which man is going to do the hard work in this multi-culti, anti-white society and save the white girls? Women are most vulnerable to these messages. Their egalitarian, sensitive natures are under assault.

Remember those commercials in the 90s, where the young white boy said, "If you don't teach your daughter about sex...I will." Well, he meant that. And those aggressive black boys want to teach your white daughter something too.


Until sufficient numbers of whites awaken and follow the blunt advice given by the modern-day Baalam's jackass in the form of a Nigerian Musloid:

Remove your governments. They are not for you.

- with all that implies - including the removal of all who stand in the way of such governments being removed, the planned extermination of YT will proceed.

Not even in South Africa, where the genocide is more-or-less openly announced by the ruling ANC regime and its friends, are whites doing anything to bring about its collapse. Instead, they continue to feed, oil and maintain the machine devoted to their extermination. SA whites still serve in the military, police, courts, media and government. Even the Afrikaner farmers, with literally the deadliest occupation on earth, continue to hire negroes in preference to fellow whites (though not legally forced to) despite white shantytowns. Negroes are cheaper, so they hire negroes - telling themselves that the ones they hire are "nice" negroes who will not aid their relatives in the butchery and looting.

AnalogMan said...

Anonymous said...

There are many who don't believe that blacks can ever co-exist with whites. I offer the argument that it is indeed possible.

Excellent comment, Anon. I hope you will contribute more. Please take a handle so that we can recognise you.

You need to go a bit further down that path, though. Dogs are pack animals, and they need a hierarchical organization, with their own place clearly defined. If they sense weakness in the pack leader, they'll challenge him for the position.

That's our problem with the negro. We've abdicated our leading role, and he's taking over. He needs to be slapped down, hard, and made to understand his place. And just as you would have been punished for doing what your dog needed done, so we would be punished if we tried to sort out the negro problem.

To be explicit, what you're not saying is that negroes can function in civilized society under conditions that would allow them to contribute to the extent of their abilities, while preventing them from behaving destructively. We had a system like that. It was called slavery.

Anonymous said...

You may also find a nicer life in australia or nz, not perfect but far less to deal with than the US